Example, to search for all recorded cases of biostimulant use on tomato mitigate effects of drought type: "tomato, drought"

EM

Type: Mix of different types, Company: EMRO

Effect

Increased produce quality

EM treated Apple tree, cv. Anna, grown in optimal conditions had 11.8 % more new shoots/main branch, were 11.6 % taller, had a 33.7 % bigger shoot diameter, leafs had a 46.2 % bigger area, contained 9.1 % more chlorophyll, 13.7 % more N, 23.9 % more P, 5.4 % more K, 8.3 % more Fe, 7.1 % more Mn and 21 % more Zn, had a 24.7 % higher fruit yield, 10.5 % heavier fruits, 5.4 % longer fruits, a 4.8 % bigger fruit diameter, the same fruit firmness, fruits contained 13.9 % more total soluble solids, were 6.8 % less acid and contained 3.9 % more total sugars  compared to the untreated control trees. The solid form in the highest dose gave in general the best results.

Trial details
outdoor, unprotected soil grown (calcareous), optimal conditions
Egypt

Crop

Apple, Malus x domestica

Trial application

Method
Incorporated into top 20 cm soil layer
Timing
First application at the beginning of February, followed by 9 treatments with a three-weekly interval
Rate
Solid form (Bokashi): 0.2, 0.4 or 0.8 kg/tree/application time; Solution EM: 0.3, 0.6 or 1.2 L/tree/application time
Sahain, M.F.M., Abd El Motty, E.Z., El-Shiekh, M.H., & Hagagg L.F.
2007
Effect of Some Biostimulant on Growth And fruiting of Anna Apple Trees in Newly Reclaimed Areas
Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences
3
422-429
Crop group