Example, to search for all recorded cases of biostimulant use on tomato mitigate effects of drought type: "tomato, drought"

Stimulate

Type: Mix of different types, Company: GarrCo

Effect

No effect on nitrogen N use efficiency
No effect on produce quality

Stimulate treated Wheat grown in a greenhouse in optimal conditions or with a reduced nitrogen application had on average 0.3 % less fresh matter aboveground, 6.2 % less dry matter aboveground, 10.4 % less fresh matter of root, 9.1 % less dry matter of root, 2 % longer roots, 3.5 % more root surface, 10.4 % smaller root diameter, 4.7 % more root volume, 8.5 % more N aboveground part, 6.3 % more C aboveground part, 1.6 % less N in roots and 0.5 % less C in roots compared to the untreated control. There wasn't a significant interaction between the biostimulant application and the nitrogen rate, only for the dry matter aboveground. 

Trial details
indoor, greenhouse, wash sand:perlite mix substrate, optimal conditions and reduced nitrogen conditions
UK

Crop

Wheat, Triticum aestivum L.

Trial application

Method
Seed treatment or foliar spray
Timing
Seed treatment before sowing, Foliar spray during leaf initiation
Rate
Seed treatment: 4 mL/kg of seeds for 30 min/ Foliar spray: 250 mL/ha
Queiroz De Almeida, A., Hedden, P., & Peres Soratto, R.
2014
Effect of nitrogen and application ways of a plant biostimulant on different wheat genotypes contrasting in stature
African Journal of Agricultural Research
9
2540-2545
Crop group